12/8/2022 0 Comments Cockroach simulator delirious![]() ![]() Finally, we show how the use of the taxonomy allowed us to discuss the features of the proposed future technologies in terms of how they furnish each of the factors of the taxonomy. We validated the perceived usability of this design fiction world with an expert in exposure therapy for small-animal phobias, whom perceived it as useful and correct. In this world, in addition to IVET, VRET and ARET, where the objects of fear are either real (in the former) or virtual (in the two later), we envision a new kind of mixed reality therapy, where the objects of fear are represented using context-aware smart objects, capable of inferring the emotional state of the patient, and of adapting their behavior to improve the system’s response during the therapy which in turn, may enrich the patient’s therapy experience. In addition, we developed the concept of smart objects of fear by means of a design fiction world. To illustrate this taxonomy in use, we conducted a survey to compare mixed reality applications for small-animal phobias, analysing their features according to the factors proposed in the taxonomy. The taxonomy comprises feedback factors in three categories, namely realism, interaction, and intensity while considering: auditory, haptic and visual dimensions for each. In this work we propose a taxonomy of feedback factors that affect the experience of use of mixed reality systems for small-animal phobias. Recently virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) and Augmented reality exposure therapy (ARET) have been presented and validated as suitable tools, however, to the best of our knowledge, no other work has identified nor provided an explicit classification or taxonomy to classify, compare and even inform the design of these kind of systems. ![]() In vivo exposure therapy (IVET) is the treatment of choice for specific phobias, including animal phobia. We discuss these results in terms of future design and evaluation guidelines for Mental Health technologies. The results also show some main differences between technology-mediated therapy and traditional non-mediated therapy. Both therapies produce a significant reduction in the clinical outcome measures and allow the clients to interact with a real phobic stimulus after the therapeutic session. This pilot results show that ARET and IVET are both clinically effective. To analyze participants' activity, we have adopted a multidisciplinary and mixed perspective based on clinical and usercentered approaches. The objective of this paper is to report the preliminary results of a comparative analysis of ARET and IVET applied to the treatment of phobia to small animals. More recently, several studies have suggested that Augmented Reality Exposure Therapy (ARET) is a potentially effective technology in this field. In Vivo Exposure Therapy (IVET) has been a recommended protocol for the treatment of specific phobias. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |